Replying in GameSpy reviews Hammer & Sickle

Last 10 Posts [ In reverse order ]

Slaughter	Posted 7th December 2005, 5:31pm
	10 out of 10 from ThinkComputers.org (didn't read it yet)
Gungadin	Posted 6th December 2005, 10:14pm
	What an awful review. See what he wrote under "Sound." This is supposed to be an action game indeed... And again the reviewer is disappointed that it isn't more Falloutish when it's billed as an RPG. Why do they get Soccer game afficionados to write reviews for games like SS?
Slaughter	Posted 6th December 2005, 8:07pm
	Another review at GameZone
Gungadin	Posted 4th December 2005, 10:28pm
	I think he's right about one thing: HS shouldn't have been marketed as an RPG game. The SS series are tactical shooters with RPG ELEMENTS, not real RPGs. I don't like that review - reviewer seemed to be expecting Fallout, not Jagged Alliance, and was severely disappointed.
Slaughter	Posted 4th December 2005, 2:03pm
	Another review at GamesFirst.
Raxxman	Posted 1st December 2005, 12:20pm
	In light of his load time, the reviewers specs are fairly low.
Crazy Gringo	Posted 1st December 2005, 5:58am
	Another one of those friday afternoon reviews? I will have to see for myself
Gungadin	Posted 30th November 2005, 11:06pm
	We'll see. Gamespy has been wrong on numerous occasions before, I'm getting the game to see for myself.
Slaughter	Posted 30th November 2005, 10:17pm
	GameSpy just published their review of Hammer & Sickle. They think the idea has bundles of potential, but aren't too happy with the execution. You can find the full review here. Thanks for the heads up Decado
Review the complete topic (launches new window)

S2 / S3 News