spacer

Welcome Guest ( Log In | Register )

> Posting Guidelines

Please read the Forum Rules before posting.

 
Digg this topic Save to del.icio.us Submit to Reddit Slashdot It
Reply to this topicStart new topic
> Xcom has returned to me, Game is old, but still solid gold
Praylak
post 12th May 2003, 2:41pm
Post #1


Squaddie
*

Group: Members
Posts: 1
Joined: May 2003
Member No.: 893



My first post here, and I would just like to start out by saying its so great being able to play Enemy Unknown once again. I didn't think it possible to replay this legend on this sort of machine, at least until I found the xcomutil. The author and his affiliates are due some serious praise and I salute them.

In the midst of my new found excitement, I thought it may prove interesting to some about a recent revelation I had about Xcom, and games in general.

Is it just me, or do others find it strange that this high end PC I have here, capable of running the latest titles at a zillion frames per second is spending all it's time with a game made for the 486? I buy on average 10-20 games a year, and for the past several years, only a few come to mind as being really good, quality games. Am I getting old, and games today are aimed at the younger folk? What the hell has happened? Where are the new Xcoms, Masters of Magic, etc?

Now I've read about the upcoming Aftermath title, and although I'm quite excited about it, I'm also worried about it. Will it be what Xcom was? Sure I expect fancy graphics and all, but will it have the balls under the hood like the original? Just seems like developers these days are ignoring the genre of these deep, involving strategy games that have style.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post
AcidBoot
post 13th May 2003, 3:30am
Post #2


The refried frontal lobe of the soul.
*

Group: Members
Posts: 42
Joined: October 2002
From: Australia
Member No.: 15



IMO the biggest danger with Aftermath is that it's going to be real time and quasi real time. A bit like a mix between Baldur's Gate and Laser Squad Nemesis.

I think it's a real shame that so many games are drifting from "pure" turn based games in favour of the glam of real time. OK... LSN is still, strictly speaking, turn based, but there's a large degree of unpredictability involved. I suspect that the same kind of unpredictability will follow through in Aftermath, possibly more-so, which is a real pity in a game where it might be nice to preserve your forces somewhat.

OK, I'm not exactly TopDog at LSN, but even if I win by a land slide I typically lose about half my force. True, some of you players lose half the guys you send on any given mission in XCOM, but that can hardly be considered a "good" result.


--------------------
About 95% of people are kidding themselves. The trouble is that almost all of that 95%, by their nature, belive that they are in the other 5%. Ironically most of the 5% are worried that they may be in the 95%.
Go to the top of the page
 
+Quote Post

Reply to this topicStart new topic
1 User(s) are reading this topic (1 Guests and 0 Anonymous Users)
0 Members:

 

Collapse

> Similar Topics

    Topic Title Replies Topic Starter Views Last Action
No new   151 The Veteran 7,997 3rd March 2005, 6:48am
Last post by: Fox
No New Posts   2 thecyke 655 15th November 2002, 1:25am
Last post by: DragonHawk
No New Posts   2 r0dent 854 5th January 2003, 8:33am
Last post by: BladeFireLight
No New Posts   2 BubbleLabby 747 27th May 2003, 12:38am
Last post by: DragonHawk
No New Posts   0 The Veteran 664 18th September 2003, 1:27pm
Last post by: The Veteran

RSS Lo-Fi Version Time is now: 5th December 2008, 12:23am