UFO Aftermath Review

by on 9th Jul 2006

UFO: Aftermath. Hmm. Where do these alien invasion strategy games keep coming from, eh? They're practically a genre in their own right. Are they a sort of computer game 'running commentary' on human civilisation? Or are the Commies satirising the West's current interference in the Middle East through our beloved medium, seeking to destabilise the righteous capitalist bastion?

I don't think so. That would be paranoia. But that doesn't mean it isn't happening...

Anyway, as we all know, the aliens have invaded. This time, they bombard the planet with spores before moving in, killing or mutating the majority of life on earth. Obviously the aliens have gone a little soft, and no longer feel up to leading the invasion. The ragged remnants of humanity coalesce, forming the Council of Earth (Eat it, United Nations) and their multinational unit of meat he- er, cannon fo- um, elite soldiers, Phoenix Company. Your mission is to strike back, and stop the aliens from wiping out the human race.

UFO: Aftermath has two main game modes. The first is strategic, giving you a global view of the Earth. Here, you intercept alien craft and choose ground missions, assigning them to your own hard nuts or delegating them to decidedly less elite forces. By carrying out missions, you spread your influence and gain new territories and the bases within. At the beginning, the three types of bases are military, research, or engineering. The first extends your influence further over the local area, the latter two contribute to research and development respectively. The aliens can of course steal this territory back from you, often culminating in the traditional base assault.

Intercepting alien craft is disappointing. If you have multiple military bases, you can send out multiple interceptors, but your involvement ends there. When the interceptors reach the alien craft, you're treated to what is basically a cut scene of the dogfight (complete with stirring music) and offered the option to retreat, or skip the scene and find out who won, rendering the whole thing redundant. Baffled? I am.

The second game mode is tactical, with your men carrying out missions to capture downed alien craft, rescue inept pilots who were shot down, recover live enemy specimens and capture and defend bases, to name a few. The simultaneous action system is basically real-time but you can pause it whenever you want. The action also pauses whenever something significant happens. The default conditions are annoying. "Sir, I stubbed my toe.", "Sir, I saw a small marmoset.", "Sir, I have to go to the toilet." and other trivial things, but this can be easily changed. Movement orders queue nicely, but others do not, for some reason. A soldier will move to Point A and then on to Point B, but will not move to Point A and start firing at an enemy. This makes combat slightly more laborious than it should be, and I hate the SA system anyway. It makes the pacing of the missions uneven, with an arrhythmic stop-start-stop progression that makes it difficult to play for long periods of time.

There are quite a lot of missions in the course of the game, and you're meant to take on the most important ones yourself and delegate or ignore the others, because you only have one squad, and one helicopter to transport them in. I know, you'd think the Council of Earth would have given the force that is fighting to save humanity a few more resources, but no. Apparently not. You have a maximum of seven soldiers with which to tackle any mission. I don't have a problem with that, a smaller squad means the gameplay lurches along faster, but only having one squad seems a mite harsh at best, and artificially stringent at worst. Obviously the aim is to enhance the strategic element, and prevent you from carrying out every mission and beating every enemy, I just feel you could be nudged in that direction with a little more subtlety.

Despite my hatred of the Pause-O-Matic game style, I think it says a lot about the missions that I still enjoy them. Although resource management is not really a part of the game, you get to kit your soldiers out with a nice selection of weapons, including alien and hybrid technology. Pistols, rifles, submachine guns, shotguns, explosives, lasers, plasma guns, all present and correct and all have their uses. You'll be blowing a nice array of enemies into mush with them, too. The transgenants are the mutated remains of indigenous lifeforms, including humans, and they make up the rank and file of the enemy forces. Around twenty different species, most paler than a vampire's armpit, armed to the teeth (sometimes armed just with teeth), meaning you often need to adopt different tactics. The Reticulans are the real challenge, armed and armoured with their alien technology and driven by an unnatural urge to do horrid gribbly things to mankind before covering the Earth in crap, figuratively if not literally.

I do enjoy a good challenge, and Aftermath provides one. Your team, no matter how elite they get, never get so good that you can disregard tactics. The 'Hard' difficulty especially gives you a good game, with a steep but regular learning curve, except in the very last stages where it goes a bit mental. Admittedly, the difficulty is directly linked to your performance, and can take some frustrating jumps, but that's a lot better than being able to walk all over the opposition. This is a fight against overwhelming odds, after all.

The strategic view is actually quite nice, giving you easy access to your squad, R&D and the glossary (read: UFOpaedia), as well as controls for manipulating the global view and game speed. So far, so X-Com. The tactical mission graphics are depressing. So they do a great job of establishing that post-apocalyptic feel that makes you want to take up religion. After a few weeks of chanting "Hare Krishna!" you're ready to face the game again. The tactical interface leaves something to be desired, though. Soldiers are colour-coded for ease of identification, but some of the colours don't stand out against the drab environments, making them difficult to see. Showing a soldier's health both above their heads and in the status bar is redundant, as are the pictures of the soldier's faces. They don't tell you anything, nor do they assist in any other way (in the case of Peter 'Sad Sack' Heinz, I had to stop playing to go away and cry).

Honourable mention goes to the man who thought the arrow keys should make the camera rotate in the opposite direction. Now I know why people go on killing sprees.

The music is quite unobtrusive, and does what it's meant to. Even the tunes on the strategic view are inoffensive enough to remain turned on throughout the game, and usually thematic background tracks are the first things that A) annoy me and B) get switched off. The interception music is quite rousing, despite its annoying loop (bet they wanted 'Danger Zone' from Top Gun, though) and even the tactical mission tunage is okay. Sound effects are nice, nothing special, and the speech is bloody annoying. If I never hear Dick 'Speech Therapy' McReady slur "No route t'destinashun." again, like a drunk with a cleft palate, it will be too soon. Their constant talking combined with the little green health bars, only reminded me of Command and Conquer, no one's idea of tactical depth, I'm sure. Still, akin to my dislike of the SA system, this is not so much a fault with the game as my personal preference.

Research and development is much simplified from the X-Com archetype, sometimes for the better. The pictures in the glossary could do with being a bit bigger, too much of the page is taken up with flashy graphics that mean nothing. Plainly, a lot of thought has gone into the enemies and their technology, and although not truly alien in the purest sense of the word, they are at least a little more original than the usual clich├ęs we are served and expected to swallow whole. The organic characteristics of their technology is a nice touch. I've never seen ships with tentacles before, at least.

There's a lot I don't like about UFO: Aftermath. It has some glaring flaws, it's far from perfect, but I still enjoy playing on it, and it's a good starting point for Altar to build upon.

Graphics - 8/10
Sound - 7/10
Gameplay - 6/10

Reviewer's Verdict: 6/10

 

Add Comment Comments

Pete\
12 Sep 2006 - 6:48am
Pete
"Coming soon - UFO Aftershock, Silent Storm: Sentinels and X-COM 1-6 reviews" :) :)
Zombie\
12 Sep 2006 - 1:59am
Zombie
Wow, surperb job on the review FA! I just spent an enjoyable half-hour reading through it a few times. It's nice to read a review where the author tells it like it is without too much bias. Kudos to you!  :)

- Zombie
FullAuto\
11 Sep 2006 - 2:41pm
FullAuto
Thank you.

@ Thorondor:  I left out mentioning those lovely rocket spitters and a few other things in specific, and just mentioned 'sudden jumps' in the difficulty level instead.  Every player should have the 'joy' of discovering those.
Azrael Strife\
11 Sep 2006 - 2:36pm
Azrael Strife
Really enjoyed reading that, nice job FA :)

Btw, I still love the geoscape of UFO: AM :)
Thorondor\
11 Sep 2006 - 9:55am
Thorondor
A very enjoyable read. Certainly, the "grumpy", good-natured tone, of the review makes it a breeze to wade through, while still delivering all the relevant data gameplay-wise.

I would, perhaps, have included a word of warning about the rocket-launcher toting aliens, and a mention of psi projectors and deployable weapons. Still, nothing wrong with letting players get rewardingly slapped around for a bit... :) ;)

::

All in all - good work, FullAuto! :)
Space Voyager\
11 Sep 2006 - 7:25am
Space Voyager
I like these reviews of chewed-up games. They always make me want to reinstall... EDIT: Than I reconsider. :)

 

Add Comment

You must be logged in to reply. Please log in or register an account.